Global Warming Solution ? Aneutronic Fusion Reactor
Nuclear fusion takes location when light atomic nucleus collides with every other to combine to form a heavier atomic nucleus releasing a tremendous quantity of energy. For fusion reactions to take place are needed kinetic energy and confinement to attain collisions at the needed rate. Nuclear fusion reactions have an power density numerous times higher than nuclear fission. The nuclear fission involving uranium-235 and plutonium-239 generate more radiation hazards and radioactive waste than a conventional neutronic nuclear fusion involving deuterium and tritium, and the conventional neutronic nuclear fusion produce a lot more neutrons than an aneutronic nuclear fusion involving boron hydrides, helium-three and lithium hydrides, which goods are a non-radioactive waste helium-four. Each release millions of times more energy than chemical reactions.
The CrossFire Fusor is a nuclear fusion reactor created by Moacir L. Ferreira Jr. for fusing atomic nucleus in order to produce huge quantities of energy without pollution and no neutron hazards.
This fusion reactor is comprised by six superconducting magnets disposed to form a magnetic cusp region in where positive ions are injected. At the magnetic cusp region is applied a negative voltage and at the opposite finish of every single magnet is applied a positive voltage. The ions are accelerated electrostatically towards the negative possible passing by way of the magnetic cusp reaching the chamber interior, where the ions are confined radially by magnetic fields and longitudinally by electric fields, that is a 3-dimensional confinement. The ion injection is completed continuously surrounding the magnetic cusp region to perform a three-dimensional injection. The positive voltage confines only reactants permitting the items from the fusion reactions to escape.
The ions are injected with wonderful kinetic power (600KeV), but in modest quantities, and calculations are done for the magnetic and electric fields to confine the ionized plasma, keeping it away from the chamber walls.
The CrossFire Fusor was based on stellated polyhedrons, accelerating electrostatically reactants inwardly to the central edges and products escaping at peripheral vertices soon after overcoming the confinement of electric fields.
Though this reactor makes use of electrostatic acceleration like the Farnsworth–Hirsch Fusor, it doesn’t have a central-grid to cause losses. Then the ions, below electrostatic acceleration, can reach great kinetic power with inexpressive energy consumption. Also, there is no recirculation of electrons to induce excessive electromagnetic radiation.
Due to use of electrostatic acceleration, the CrossFire Fusor is able to fuse not only conventional fuels such as deuterium-tritium, but also aneutronic fuels like boron hydrides, helium-3 and lithium hydrides. Aneutronic fusion reactions release millions of times a lot more energy than the fossil fuels, practically not emit neutrons and the products of the reaction is primarily helium-4 that is safe and clean.
The fusion reaction merchandise are positively charged which can be deflected by magnetic and electric fields. Then a conversion to electricity is relatively straightforward. The conversion is completed in the course of the neutralization by a positive electric voltage to slow down and an electron gun to neutralize. The existing of electrons and the electric voltage is equal to electric power (P=V×I).
CrossFire Fusor supplies solutions for two drawbacks that are typical to nuclear fusion:
1. Ionic saturation, excess of ions in the chamber, which could be solved by a stronger superconducting magnet, by decreasing the specific ionization of the plasma and by having an sufficient escape mechanism.
2. Electromagnetic radiation losses, that could be decreased by a reflective internal coating in order to reflect the electromagnetic radiation back to the plasma.
The positive aspects of the CrossFire Fusor more than others fusion approaches are:
1. 3-dimensional injection and confinement, which enhance the probability and velocity of the fusion reactions.
2. Escape mechanism, which reduces the ionic saturation and instabilities of power, and provides each with efficiency, propulsion and electricity generation.
three. A method for electricity conversion that can exceed 95% of efficiency.
four. Easy and consistent calculations, which give a reasonable degree of predictability.
As an alternative source of energy, this fusion reactor could replace the 10 billion tons/year of carbon dioxide from fossil fuels to only 7600 tons/year of clean, inert, secure and light helium gas, which can lessen drastically the Global Warming Problem.
source: crossfirefusor
What do you believe? Answer below!
Geography of Gabon : Natural Nuclear Fission Reactor, Kingdom of Orungu, Central African Mangroves, List of Ecoregions in Gabon, Belinga
No Synopsis Obtainable
List Price: 7.98
Cost:
Related Nuclear Fission Reactor Articles
Fission? No. If we ever get Fusion working, it may be a possibility. There is nothing about Fission that can cause a chain reaction. For those kind of things, you may want to read up on particle accelerators, and the mini black holes and super hot energy bursts they make. Crazy stuff.
In France? Who cares?
Fission?
How do the french render a military salute?
By putting both hands above their heads.
Fission. We did that in a squash court at University of Chicago back in the 30′s.
Now fusion, not freaking likely, yet.
science.howstuffworks.com/fusion-reactor.htm
There are thousands of fission reactors operating in the world at this very moment. The answer is no it will not. There would not be enough energy released if this reactor did explode to destroy the world. Such explosions have occured many times in the last century, they are called nuclear weapons.
Gee, I hope not!
I think you are confusing nuclear fission with nuclear fusion. All nuclear reactors in use are fission. These produce energy by splitting atoms into smaller 1′s. They cannot implode. They can get out of control, as happened at 3 mile island & disasterously at Chernobyl. Fusion produces energy by combining 2 small atoms into a bigger 1. Stars are the only working fusion reactors we know of. H bombs use fusion to produce energy. Fusion reactors are under development in the US & probably elsewhere. So far, no one has been able to make a sustainable fusion reactor, so the danger of any kind of runaway are extremely remote.
All nuclear reactions produce energy by destroying a small quantity of matter (e=mc^2).
IF a viable fusion reactor can be built, it would indeed be a huge benefit to mankind, but as far as I know, it is still a long way off.
No. France has had fission for @50 years, so a new reactor is nothing to get your knickers in a twist over. Fission doesn’t implode. The worst that could happen (and it is HIGHLY unlikely) is that whatever they’re using for fuel (uranium, plutonium, etc.) could get to critical mass. One big boom, end of reaction. The facility might be destroyed, depending on a number of factors, but not the world.